Published on 2020-10-25. Modified on 2021-07-20.
I get a lot of email in which people tend to ask the same questions, so I will try to fill out this FAQ with answers to the most common questions (as time permits).
My RSS feed is not broken. The RSS 2.0 specification doesn't require the main article to be a part of the RSS feed and I don't believe it should be as the feed reader isn't a web browser.
Originally when the RSS specification was made and version 0.91 came out the description field of the item section was an optional description with a maximum length of 500 characters and it only contained a short description or summary of the main article. The description field in the RSS 2.0 specification is still optionally if you use the title field.
Don't let the bad habit of stuffing the main article into the feed make you believe that this is how it's supposed to work. You should use an RSS feed to keep you updated, but you should read the main article in a web browser where it belongs.
I write HTML and CSS by hand. Please see: Come full circle - back to HTML.
Please see: Come full circle - back to HTML
OpenBSD because it is very Unix-like and very well designed. The developers make great effort in doing things right, as opposed to what might be popular. All the OpenBSD applications and tools follow a specific set of rules in both code implementation, security, configuration and documentation, which makes OpenBSD really stand out because of the high quality.
The OpenBSD developers are very thorough and meticulous in the work they do. You will find no hype or trends in OpenBSD.
Please see: OpenBSD is fantastic
This is difficult to answer because it depends on your requirements and experience. Almost anything open source is better than Microsoft Windows.
I recommend that you take some time to study a bit first. Learn a little about the Unix philosophy and the Unix shell (perhaps get a good book) before you begin your journey. Even if you never need any of this it will still benefit you greatly.
You will find that from a day-to-day user experience point of view, once you have everything set up as you like, there is little difference and most FOSS operating systems will solve your problems equally well. This is because we actually rarely deal with the operating system itself, we mostly deal with applications. Whether you e.g. use mpv to watch a movie on a Linux distribution or a BSD flavor makes no difference as long as you get great hardware support, the movie will play fine on both.
However, there is a big difference in how secure the operating system is. There is also a difference in what type of file system is supported, how much you can tune and fiddle with the operating system, whether the operating system (in the case of a Linux distribution) comes with a preset desktop environment or you install one yourself, how good the package manager is at solving dependency issues, whether you need a proprietary graphics driver, or you can manage with an open source version, etc.
In any case, I do not recommend a Linux distribution that "holds your hand" too much because you'll learn nothing and gain no control over your system.
I generally don't recommend Ubuntu or Ubuntu based distributions. Neither do I recommend Fedora or Fedora based distributions. These distributions often make the Linux experience bad because they try to be everything at once, but without doing anything particularly well.
Take a look at my article Some of the great GNU/Linux distributions.
I don't! I use a regular old dumb phone.
If you absolutely cannot live without a smartphone (you know you can right?), then at least find a supported device you can root and install one of the open source versions of Linux on the device.
None of the public services.
None of the public services. Setup your own recursive resolver. Even if you only have a single laptop, you can still setup a recursive resolver on that and then send all DNS queries to 127.0.0.1. I highly recommend Unbound.
Yes!
I managed to spend a big part of my life providing support for Microsoft Windows and other Microsoft related products, both on the desktop and on the server market. I cannot count how many hours of my life I have wasted due to the absolutely poor quality of these products compared to the open source alternatives. In every single case, where I later convinced someone to move to an open source alternative, the result was the same, an amazing rise in stability, security and overall run time.
In my opinion Microsoft Windows is some of the worst piece of garbage you can install on a machine and it has not gotten any better over the years.
Unless you're a gamer, I see no reason what so ever to ever want to have Microsoft Windows installed on anything!
And no, Microsoft has not changed and suddenly become the best of friends with the FOSS communities! They have just changed their business strategy.
Please see: Choosing between OpenBSD and FreeBSD.
FreeBSD with ZFS!
I don't recommend any specific hardware. If you ask this because you want to know if your hardware is compatible with OpenBSD or FreeBSD then take a look at their respective sites such as OpenBSD supported platforms and FreeBSD hardware compatibility.
If you have specific questions regarding specific hardware, then search the mailing list archives for related questions. Archives: OpenBSD misc and FreeBSD questions. If you cannot find similar questions, join the relevant list and ask if anyone else has any experience with the specific hardware you need information about.